Connect with us

Politics

Top USAID Security Officials Placed on Leave After Tense Confrontation with Musk’s Government Office

Published

on

Two senior security officials at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) were placed on administrative leave Saturday after they refused access to personnel from Elon Musk’s newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The confrontation escalated when DOGE staff attempted to physically enter USAID’s Washington, D.C. headquarters and threatened to involve law enforcement, according to multiple sources familiar with the situation.

The DOGE personnel allegedly demanded access to USAID’s security systems and personnel files, and some sources claimed they sought classified information as well. When denied access, DOGE staff reportedly threatened to call U.S. Marshals to gain entry, further intensifying the standoff.

The two USAID officials placed on leave, Director of Security John Voorhees and his deputy, are the latest in a series of high-level departures at the agency. These events have sparked concerns among some lawmakers that the Trump administration may be deliberately undermining USAID. Rumors have circulated that President Donald Trump is considering signing an executive order to merge USAID with the U.S. State Department, a move that Democratic lawmakers have argued would be illegal.

USAID, which provides billions of dollars in foreign assistance annually, plays a critical role in global efforts to combat poverty, address health crises, and respond to natural disasters. The agency employs more than 10,000 people, with a significant portion of its workforce stationed abroad. In fiscal year 2023, USAID extended assistance to about 130 countries.

This incident comes on the heels of other developments at the agency, including the suspension of around 60 senior USAID staff last week. These employees were accused of attempting to bypass an executive order regarding foreign aid, though no evidence of wrongdoing was found. Another senior official was also put on leave for attempting to reverse the action.

In addition, it has been reported that the entire USAID public affairs office was locked out of its systems, leaving staff without access to their work.

CNN has reached out to both the White House and USAID for further comment on the ongoing situation.

Politics

Tension Inside Treasury Department After Trump’s Team Targets Payment Processing System

Published

on

By

A series of unsettling interactions between Donald Trump’s transition team and top Treasury Department officials has raised concerns over the future of federal payment systems. Just weeks before Trump’s inauguration, his team, including members of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), sought detailed information on how the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS) processes trillions of dollars in government payments annually.

These payments, including Social Security benefits, tax refunds, and salaries for federal workers, are handled by BFS, a critical department responsible for nearly 90 percent of federal disbursements, amounting to over $5 trillion a year. What began as a routine inquiry soon turned into an alarming effort to examine the department’s payment systems more closely, with Trump’s team requesting access to sensitive information about the disbursement process.

Career Treasury officials were concerned by the unusual focus on the BFS. The requests, which included details about the department’s proprietary computer systems and field offices handling payments, raised suspicions among officials, particularly as they were unprecedented in previous presidential transitions. These actions, combined with the repeated focus on payment infrastructure, prompted worries about possible disruptions to an essential financial system.

Tensions escalated following the recent resignation of David Lebryk, the Treasury Department’s top civil servant, who left amid mounting pressure from Trump’s allies. Sources claim that Trump-affiliated officials had pressed to explore the Treasury’s ability to halt specific payments. Lebryk, however, pushed back, stating that halting payments was not within the bureau’s role, which is to disburse funds as directed by other agencies.

The controversy surrounding federal payments grew when the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directed a freeze on trillions of dollars in federal spending, an order that was rescinded after causing an uproar. The episode, which involved Trump’s pick for Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, further amplified divisions within the department.

This week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren called for an investigation into the matter, expressing concern over Musk’s involvement and the potential political interference in critical payment processes. Musk had previously indicated his interest in reforming payment approval systems, claiming that Treasury officials had historically approved payments, including those to fraudulent or terrorist groups. This assertion, however, overlooks the established systems in place to ensure lawful payments.

As political maneuvering continues, the future of the BFS remains uncertain. The department’s crucial role in maintaining the country’s financial stability could be jeopardized by ongoing efforts to alter or halt certain federal payments, potentially undermining the trust necessary for a smooth-running economy. Meanwhile, the legal challenges to the administration’s spending freeze continue, highlighting the deep legal implications of any efforts to disrupt government payments.

Continue Reading

Politics

Guantanamo Bay Could Play Key Role in Trump’s Immigration Plan

Published

on

By

The U.S. Naval base at Guantanamo Bay, located in Cuba, is poised to take on a new role in President Donald Trump’s ongoing efforts to overhaul the nation’s immigration system. Known globally for its high-security prison housing alleged terrorist suspects, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the base has long been a subject of human rights debates. Now, it could become central to Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration, as the administration looks to increase detention space for migrants.

For decades, Guantanamo has also been home to a separate migrant detention facility, traditionally used to hold Haitian and Cuban refugees intercepted at sea before they reach U.S. shores. Now, Trump’s administration has instructed the Department of Defense and Homeland Security to prepare the base to house up to 30,000 detainees, though it remains unclear whether the facility can support such a large number of people.

The move to utilize Guantanamo for migrant detentions serves two key purposes for Trump. Firstly, it addresses the immediate need for more detention space in the face of rising migrant arrests. Secondly, the base’s notorious reputation could help bolster Trump’s image as tough on immigration, a message he has long used to energize his base and show voters he is fulfilling campaign promises.

The Guantanamo facility, which is distinct from the infamous prison for terror suspects, has faced its own share of criticism. Civil rights groups have raised alarms about the facility’s treatment of detainees, pointing to inhumane conditions such as contaminated water, open sewage exposure, and inadequate medical care. Despite these issues, the Biden administration considered utilizing the base for Haitian migrant processing last year.

The decision to repurpose the facility is likely to stir controversy, especially given Guantanamo’s historical significance as a symbol of human rights abuses. Vince Warren, Executive Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, expressed concern over the potential for abuse, calling it “a global symbol and site of lawlessness, torture, and racism.” He warned that the move would exacerbate the stigma surrounding migrants, especially when associated with the infamous prison.

Trump’s announcement came at a White House ceremony for the signing of the Laken Riley Act, named in honor of a Georgia nursing student killed by an undocumented migrant. The new law mandates the detention of undocumented migrants accused of certain crimes, such as theft or burglary, reinforcing Trump’s hardline stance on immigration.

While Guantanamo’s symbolic power may resonate with many Republicans, it raises significant legal and ethical questions. Critics fear the facility could become a tool for further erosion of migrant rights, especially as the U.S. grapples with the complex issue of asylum claims. Already, groups like the International Refugee Assistance Project have called for a shutdown of the center, citing its history of poor conditions and limited access to legal protections.

The expansion of the Guantanamo facility for migrants also raises logistical concerns. According to officials, the base may have housed 30,000 people in the 1990s, but current infrastructure and staffing levels would need significant upgrades to accommodate such a large number of detainees.

The announcement of Guantanamo’s new role in Trump’s immigration strategy also sparked outrage from Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel, who condemned the U.S. government’s plans and labeled the move as an act of brutality. With both sides of the political spectrum reacting strongly to the announcement, the controversy surrounding Guantanamo Bay is far from over.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s “Golden Age” and Parallels to the Gilded Age: A Historical Perspective

Published

on

By

As President Donald Trump touts a new “golden age” for the United States, some critics have raised comparisons to the Gilded Age—a period in the late 19th and early 20th centuries marked by industrial growth, extreme wealth inequality, and political corruption. To better understand these parallels, historian Richard White, a Stanford professor emeritus, offers insight into the similarities and differences between Trump’s vision and the historical era.

In a recent interview, White noted that while the Gilded Age and today share some common themes, including a focus on industrialization, tariffs, and the consolidation of wealth, they are also distinct in many ways. “Trump’s focus on industrialization and his approach to tariffs mirror the economic policies of the Gilded Age,” White explained. “The way he courts the wealthy also resonates with the period of monopolies and robber barons.”

During his first term, Trump often admired Andrew Jackson, but recently shifted his admiration to William McKinley, a figure emblematic of the Gilded Age. White pointed out that McKinley was known for advocating tariffs, such as the McKinley Tariff, which ultimately had negative political consequences. Trump’s policies, including his push for high tariffs, reflect a similar economic strategy, though White emphasized McKinley’s later moderation of such policies, which Trump has not mirrored.

Another parallel can be found in the evolution of political power. The Gilded Age saw a push for civil service reform following the assassination of President McKinley, and the subsequent presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt’s reforms helped create a more professionalized bureaucracy. Today, Trump’s attempts to weaken the power of the federal bureaucracy contrast with the historical trajectory of strengthening civil service institutions, White explained.

The role of wealth in politics also draws comparisons between Trump’s era and the Gilded Age. White observed that tech magnates like Elon Musk, who have amassed fortunes through government contracts and subsidies, echo the industrialists of the past, such as Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller. These figures, who influenced both the economy and politics, set a precedent for today’s tech titans, who enjoy similar access to political power.

White also pointed out that inequality, a hallmark of the Gilded Age, remains a defining issue in modern America. While the specific nature of economic ambition has evolved, the pursuit of wealth and financial security continues to shape American society. The conversation about the gold standard during the Gilded Age also mirrors today’s debate over the future of currency, particularly with Trump’s interest in cryptocurrency and the rise of speculative financial practices.

In conclusion, while there are undeniable echoes of the Gilded Age in Trump’s “golden age,” White cautioned that the historical parallels are not perfect. “We’re entering speculative territory again, but it’s important to understand the structural differences,” he said, referring to the shift in economic challenges from deflation in the late 19th century to modern-day deficits. As the U.S. navigates these challenges, it’s clear that history continues to inform the present.

Continue Reading

Trending