Recent serious accidents involving cyclists have reignited the debate on whether mandatory insurance for cyclists should be introduced. Neal, who has voiced support for the idea, emphasized the need to protect all road users and address concerns about cyclist safety.

Neal, an avid cyclist himself, described the concept of mandatory cycling insurance as a reasonable measure to enhance road safety. His comments follow a recent case where a drunk cyclist avoided jail time despite causing severe injuries, including the amputation of a woman’s finger, after hitting two pedestrians.

Reflecting on his own experience of being knocked off his bicycle two and a half years ago, Neal shared his personal insights: “I know what it’s like to be hit by somebody. So I think you could do with a bit of protection as well.” He also stressed the importance of safety gear, noting, “I can’t comprehend why anybody would not wear a crash hat riding a bike.”

Currently, UK law does not mandate insurance or bike registration for cyclists, as existing road laws only apply to “mechanically-propelled” vehicles. However, there is growing support for reform. The Government is considering tougher regulations for cyclists who cause accidents, a proposal initially advanced by the previous Conservative administration but delayed before the general election.

Advocates for mandatory insurance argue it would enhance accountability among cyclists and deter dangerous behaviors, such as running red lights. Despite the call for insurance, Lloyd’s, a major insurer founded in the 17th century, does not currently offer cycle insurance. The company reported a 25% increase in pre-tax profits for the first half of 2024, totaling £4.9 billion.

In addition to addressing cycling safety, Neal urged the Labour government to avoid excessive tax increases and regulatory changes that could undermine investment in the UK. With Chancellor Rachel Reeves expected to propose higher business taxes in the upcoming October Budget to tackle a £22 billion public finance deficit, Neal emphasized the need for a balanced approach.

“We just want the UK to be sensible, fair, and competitive,” Neal said. “From a tax point of view, we should pay tax, both individually and corporately. And from a regulatory point of view, it’s important that the markets are looked over, looked after, overseen well, and managed. But we need to ensure that we can remain competitive. We’ve got to be an attractive proposition globally for financial services.”

The debate over cycling insurance and the broader implications for road safety and economic policy continues to evolve, with ongoing discussions expected to shape future legislative and regulatory actions.